Get Technical SEO Fixed, Not Just Reported

The SEO Site Audit is diagnosis: we crawl and analyze your site, identify every significant technical issue, and hand you a prioritized report with specifications for each fix. This service is implementation: we take those findings, from our audit or any third-party audit, and actually ship the fixes, then validate they worked. Many clients do the audit first and then bring us in to execute. You can also start here if you already have a recent audit from another source, or if the problem is specific enough that scoping it is faster than a full diagnostic.

No. If you already have a recent audit, from us or anyone else, we can work directly from those findings. If you do not have an audit but have a specific, well-defined problem (a migration you need to run safely, a JS rendering issue you know exists, a crawl-budget problem on a large faceted site), we scope the sprint around that. The free scoping call is where we decide together whether a prior diagnostic is needed or whether the scope is already clear enough to start.

Yes, this is a normal working mode for us. We produce structured specifications (redirect maps, canonical logic, robots directive changes, meta-tag templates) formatted so a developer unfamiliar with the original audit can implement them without follow-up questions. After each batch of fixes ships, we run a post-deploy QA crawl to confirm the changes landed correctly and nothing adjacent regressed. We can also review pull requests or staging environments before they go live.

We implement directly where you give us scoped access: Search Console, a staging environment, robots.txt via your hosting, or least-privilege CMS credentials for specific configuration pages. Where you prefer your own team to handle the code, we produce specifications precise enough to execute without us in the room. The deliverable is shipped fixes plus post-fix validation, not a document describing what someone else should do. Your accounts and CMS stay under your control throughout.

We break it into three stages: before, during, and after. Before cutover we build the full redirect inventory, crawl the staging environment to verify URL parity and canonical logic, and check that robots.txt on staging will not go live accidentally. On launch day we monitor crawl access and initial Search Console signals. In the four weeks after launch we track coverage, crawl rate, and ranking signals, and fix any gaps that appear before they accumulate into longer-term ranking loss. The goal is that Google's view of your site transitions cleanly rather than starting over.

Crawl budget is the finite number of URL requests Googlebot makes to your site in a given period. For most small sites it is not a meaningful constraint: Googlebot crawls everything anyway. It becomes a real issue on large sites, e-commerce stores with filtered navigation, or sites with parameter-generated URL sprawl, where Googlebot can spend most of its requests on low-value variants rather than the pages that should rank. We use server log files to show you where the crawl actually goes, which is often different from where you assume it goes.

Googlebot can execute JavaScript, but it processes JS rendering in a second wave that may lag hours or days behind the initial crawl, and some content patterns still cause problems: body text that requires JavaScript to appear in the DOM, structured data injected client-side after page load, lazy-loading that fires after the crawl timeout, and hydration gaps where server-rendered and client-rendered content differ. We diagnose exactly which of these applies using a combination of raw-source inspection, render comparison, and log data, then implement the fix (SSR configuration, prerendering, or lazy-load timing adjustments) and verify the result in the raw HTML before and after.

Partially. Crawl-budget engineering and indexation control for parameter URLs (deciding which filter combinations get crawled, which get noindexed, and how the canonical hierarchy works) is core work here. The organic ranking strategy for category and product pages, including Product schema authoring, category content depth, and site architecture for a catalogue, belongs to our E-commerce SEO service. Many stores need both: infrastructure remediation here first, then content and schema work there.

The sprint packages are fixed-scope, one-time engagements. After a sprint closes, ongoing monitoring and regression guard can be scoped as a separate engagement based on your site's size and release cadence. We do not publish a retainer price here because the right scope varies significantly. The free scoping call is where we work out whether ongoing monitoring makes sense for your situation and what that would cover.

The three sprint tiers are priced at €199, €399, and €750. The right tier depends on the scope of the remediation: a focused Quick-Fix Sprint for a defined set of issues, a Remediation Sprint for multi-issue work including JS rendering and crawl-budget engineering, or a Migration and Scale Sprint for replatforming projects or large-site indexation work. We confirm the exact tier after the free scoping call, usually within 24 hours of your first message.

No, and we will be direct about why. Technical SEO removes barriers that prevent Google from crawling, rendering, and indexing your content correctly. Whether that translates into higher rankings and more traffic depends on content quality, competitive landscape, and Google's own evaluation, none of which we control. What we can confirm is that the technical blockers are removed and verified, and that we measure the before-and-after state so the impact is in data rather than a claim.

We fix rendering and delivery issues that affect how quickly content reaches both users and crawlers: SSR configuration, lazy-load timing, render-blocking resource handling, and TTFB. A deep Core Web Vitals diagnosis (identifying exactly which LCP candidate is slow, quantifying INP from real-user data, isolating CLS sources across page templates) belongs to the SEO Site Audit, which has the right scope and tooling for that level of performance work. If CWV is your primary concern, that is the better starting point.

We ensure your existing schema is valid, present in the raw HTML source (not injected client-side), and uses the current schema.org vocabulary. We also add or correct schema types that are directly tied to crawlability and indexation: sitemap schema, breadcrumb markup, and canonicalization-related signals. Authoring new schema for content types (FAQPage, Article, Product) and optimizing structured data for AI Overview eligibility is covered under our AI SEO service, which specializes in that layer.

This service is CMS-agnostic: we work with any platform and implement fixes at the server-configuration and HTML-output level regardless of what generates the pages. CMS-specific concerns (Yoast and Rank Math configuration, WordPress taxonomy archive policies, plugin stack conflicts, WooCommerce product archive indexation) belong to our WordPress SEO service, which is built around the WordPress platform layer specifically. If you are unsure which applies, the scoping call will clarify.

The same infrastructure that blocks Googlebot tends to block AI crawlers: JavaScript-only rendering, overly broad robots.txt Disallow rules, and slow TTFB that causes crawl timeouts before content is returned. We fix those at the infrastructure level, and we review robots.txt for unintended blocks on specific AI crawler agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended) where your strategy warrants it. Whether that translates into being cited in AI-generated answers is a content and entity question, not an infrastructure one. That work belongs to our AI SEO and AI Visibility services.

CyberLab.Team OÜ is registered in Tallinn, Estonia (EU), operating under GDPR. A Data Processing Agreement is available on request before any work begins. We access your site using the minimum permissions needed for each task: read access to Search Console and Analytics, a restricted staging environment login, or specific CMS configuration access with no billing or user-management permissions. We never ask for admin credentials we do not need, we never store access credentials beyond the engagement, and your accounts remain fully under your ownership throughout and after.