Skip to main content
CyberLab.Team

SEO

Get Technical SEO Fixed, Not Just Reported

A technical SEO sprint is a fixed-scope engagement that turns audit findings into shipped, verified fixes, so Google can crawl, render and index your site correctly. We implement technical SEO fixes, run site migrations without ranking loss, and monitor your infrastructure so a redeploy does not silently undo everything. Shipped changes, not a longer report.

Fixed price · Dev-ready specs · Post-fix QA crawl · EU-registered, GDPR
Request Free Audit See Pricing

Packages

Quick-Fix Sprint €199 Remediation Sprint €399 Migration & Scale Sprint €750
See details →

What we fix

Fix implementation and dev-ready specs
We take findings from your existing audit, ours or a third party's, and turn them into prioritized, Jira-ready tickets your dev team can action without ambiguity: redirect maps, canonical rule sets, robots.txt directives, and meta-tag policies. After your developers ship each batch, we run a QA crawl to confirm the fix landed correctly and nothing adjacent broke in the process.
Site migrations and replatforming SEO
Domain changes, HTTPS migrations, CMS switches, and URL restructures are high-risk moments: a missed redirect map or a staging robots.txt left on production can cost months of recovered rankings. We build the full redirect inventory before cutover, run a staging crawl to compare parity with the current site, and monitor Search Console and crawl logs in the first four weeks after launch.
Log-file analysis and crawl-budget engineering
Server logs tell you what Googlebot actually requests, not what you assume it crawls. We process your raw log files to find crawl waste on low-value URLs, orphan hits on redirected or deleted pages, and pages that matter for rankings but are never fetched. On large or faceted sites, we produce concrete tuning recommendations for robots.txt, crawl-rate settings, and internal link weight.
JavaScript rendering and render remediation
We diagnose exactly where your CSR, SSR, or hydration setup leaves content invisible to Googlebot and non-JS crawlers, then implement the fix instead of just documenting it. Work includes SSR or prerender configuration adjustments, lazy-load timing fixes, and confirming that structured data is present in the raw HTML source rather than injected after JavaScript runs.
Indexation control at scale
Faceted navigation and URL parameter explosion can push thousands of low-value variants into Google's index while the category pages that actually rank get less crawl attention. We design and implement the parameter-handling policy, pagination canonicalization, noindex directives, and sitemap engineering, deciding deliberately what should and should not be indexed.
Ongoing technical health monitoring and regression guard
Scheduled re-crawls, Search Console signal monitoring, and automated change-detection mean a routine redeploy does not silently reintroduce a noindex tag, drop a redirect, or break canonical configuration. We catch regressions before Google recrawls and demotes, rather than after traffic data shows the damage.

Technical SEO Sprint Pricing

Every engagement starts with a free scoping call. Ongoing monitoring is scoped on request after the initial sprint, because the right cadence depends on your site size and release schedule.

The Quick-Fix Sprint costs €199 and covers a defined set of findings. The Remediation Sprint (€399) adds JavaScript rendering work, log-file analysis and indexation control. The Migration and Scale Sprint (€750) covers a full migration playbook plus four weeks of post-launch monitoring.

Quick-Fix Sprint
€199
Focused remediation on a defined set of findings. Ideal for smaller sites or a single high-priority issue area.
  • Prioritized fix list from your audit findings (ours or third-party)
  • Dev-ready tickets: redirect maps, canonical rules, robots directives
  • Post-fix QA crawl to confirm fixes landed correctly
  • Search Console and crawl signal check after implementation
  • Free scoping call
Order
Most Popular
Remediation Sprint
€399
Multi-issue remediation for growing or content-heavy sites with JS rendering, indexation, or crawl-budget concerns
  • Everything in Quick-Fix Sprint
  • JavaScript rendering diagnosis and fix implementation
  • Log-file analysis and crawl-budget tuning recommendations
  • Indexation control: parameter handling, pagination, noindex policy
  • 30-day implementation Q&A after delivery
Order
Migration & Scale Sprint
€750
Site migrations, replatforming, or large-scale indexation remediation on sites with complex infrastructure
  • Everything in Remediation Sprint
  • Full migration playbook: redirect inventory, staging parity crawl, launch-day checklist
  • Post-launch monitoring for four weeks (Search Console, crawl logs, ranking signals)
  • Regression guard setup: scheduled re-crawl baseline and change-detection rules
  • Ongoing monitoring scoped on request after sprint closes
Order

Prefer not to fill in a form? Write us directly: Telegram @cyberlabteam or WhatsApp.

No lock-in, works with your existing team

No retainer contract required and no minimum beyond the sprint you book. A free scoping call defines exactly what is covered, so there are no surprises on scope or price. Where you grant scoped, least-privilege access we implement directly; where you prefer your own developers, we hand over specs precise enough to execute without us in the room. Your CMS, ad accounts, and hosting stay fully under your control.

Free scoping call
No long-term contracts
Transparent sprint pricing

What you receive at the end of the sprint

Every sprint closes with three artifacts. Nothing requires a follow-up engagement to understand what was done.

  • A prioritized fix backlog, formatted as tickets

    Each ticket names the issue, the exact spec, and the acceptance criteria. Your developers can ship them without follow-up questions.

  • A post-deploy QA crawl, before and after

    After each batch of fixes ships, we re-crawl and compare. Every fix is verified, not assumed.

  • A Search Console snapshot of the pre-fix baseline

    The starting state is documented before anything ships, so impact is measured in data, not claims.

Sample ticket Priority: High

Consolidate duplicate filter URLs behind one canonical

Issue: /category/shoes/ and /category/shoes/?sort=price both return 200 and self-canonicalize, splitting indexing signals.

Spec: point rel=canonical on every ?sort= variant to the clean category URL; once canonicals are confirmed live, add a robots.txt rule for the parameter.

Acceptance criteria: QA crawl shows zero self-canonicalizing ?sort= variants; category URLs unchanged and returning 200.

Illustrative example, not a real client deliverable.

When the report sits in a folder and nothing changes

These are the situations we fix directly, not with another document but with shipped changes and validation that they worked.

Got a 40-page audit PDF and nothing actually got fixed
The findings were real, the priorities were clear, and then the work stalled, caught between competing dev priorities, unclear specifications, or no one to QA whether the fix actually landed. A diagnosis without implementation is a cost, not an investment. We pick up from any existing audit, translate findings into actionable specs, and see them through to a verified post-fix crawl.
Replatforming or changing domain and worried about losing rankings
URL structure changes, HTTPS migrations, and CMS switches are the highest-risk moments in a site's life. A redirect map with gaps, a staging robots.txt left on production, or a canonical pointing at the old domain can wipe months of accumulated authority before you notice. We build the safeguards before cutover and monitor the signals for weeks after.
Google is not crawling new pages, or pages keep dropping out of the index
On large or faceted sites, Googlebot has a finite crawl budget and it can spend most of it on filter variants and paginated URLs rather than the category and product pages that matter. Log-file analysis shows exactly where the crawl goes; crawl-budget engineering redirects it. This is infrastructure work, not a content problem.
JavaScript-heavy site, and not sure Google actually sees the content
Single-page apps and headless front-ends often look fine in a browser while delivering an empty shell to Googlebot. Text loaded after JavaScript runs, structured data injected client-side, and lazy-load timing that fires after the crawl timeout all contribute. We diagnose the gap and implement the rendering fix, not just document what is wrong.
A store generating thousands of junk filter URLs, with Google indexing variants instead of categories
Faceted navigation on platforms like Shoper, IdoSell or PrestaShop can spawn thousands of indexed filter combinations that split crawl budget and dilute relevance on the category pages that should rank. This is index governance, not another audit: we design and implement the parameter-handling policy, pagination canonicalization, and noindex rules so Google indexes what actually drives sales. A common pattern for Polish stores in Warszawa and Kraków.
After a replatform or domain move, traffic dropped, the contractor handed over a report and disappeared
A report without implementation is a cost, not an investment. We pick a migration up at any stage: rebuild the full redirect map, compare the staging crawl against production, track Search Console signals for the first four weeks after launch, and fix regressions before Google recrawls and lowers positions. Relevant for Ukrainian businesses that changed engine or domain in the past few years.
A multilingual site where only Google visibility matters, and hreflang and canonical break on every release
Every redeploy is a potential break point: hreflang pointing at the wrong language versions, canonical resolving in an unexpected direction, noindex landing on pages that should be indexed. We set up scheduled crawls and change-detection so regressions surface in hours, not after traffic has already fallen. CyberLab.Team OÜ is EU-registered in Tallinn under GDPR, with a DPA on request. Relevant for Russian-speaking businesses that serve EU audiences through Google, not Yandex.
Every release, the dev team breaks something and no one notices until traffic drops
A leftover noindex tag from staging, a redirect that was deleted during a nav restructure, a robots.txt that blocks a key section after a CMS upgrade. These are routine deploy side effects that only surface when Search Console starts showing coverage drops. Ongoing regression guard catches them before Google recrawls, not after the rankings data shows the damage.

Migrations

How we run a migration

Migrations fail in predictable places. The work splits into three stages, and each stage has its own checklist.

1

Before cutover

We build the full redirect inventory, crawl the staging environment to verify URL parity and canonical logic, and check that the staging robots.txt cannot reach production by accident.

2

Launch day

We monitor crawl access, redirect behavior and the first Search Console signals as the new site goes live, so problems surface in hours instead of weeks.

3

Weeks 1 to 4 after

Coverage, crawl rate and ranking signals are tracked while Google re-processes the site. Gaps get closed before they turn into longer-term loss.

Recovering a migration that already went wrong

We can pick a migration up mid-project or after launch: rebuild the redirect inventory, diff the staging crawl against production, and triage the coverage drops in Search Console. One caveat we keep explicit: recovery speed depends on Google's recrawl cycle, so we never promise a timeline for regained rankings.

Who this sprint is for, and who it is not for

A good fit if you have

  • A large or faceted site where crawl budget and indexation need deliberate control
  • A JavaScript-heavy front-end and doubts about what Googlebot actually sees
  • A migration, replatform or domain change on the calendar, or one that already went wrong
  • An audit, ours or a third party's, that has been sitting unimplemented

Not the right page if you need

  • Content strategy or link building. Neither is sold on this page.
  • A deep Core Web Vitals diagnosis. That belongs to the SEO Site Audit, which has the tooling to isolate LCP, INP and CLS causes.
  • WordPress plugin-layer work such as Yoast or Rank Math configuration. That belongs to WordPress SEO.

Engagement models

Why a fixed-scope sprint

A sprint has a defined scope, a published price and an endpoint. You pay for shipped and verified fixes, not hours logged. Monitoring afterwards is scoped when needed, not locked in up front.

CyberLab fixed sprintTypical agency retainerFreelance hourly
Published price€199 / €399 / €750, on this pageQuoted after a sales callHourly rate, total open-ended
Defined scope and endpointFixed scope, closes when fixes are verifiedOpen-ended monthly commitmentScope drifts with the hours
Post-fix QAQA crawl after every fix batchVaries by agencyRarely included
EU registration, GDPR, DPAEU-registered, DPA on requestVariesVaries
Lock-inNone, one sprint at a timeUsually a multi-month contractNone, but continuity depends on one person

Generic engagement archetypes for orientation, not specific companies.

Three ways to work with us

1

We implement directly

You grant scoped, least-privilege access and can revoke it at any time. We ship the fixes, run the QA crawl, and hand everything back documented.

2

Your developers implement, we spec and QA

We write tickets precise enough to execute without us in the room, then verify each release with a post-deploy crawl.

3

Monitoring after the sprint, if it earns its place

If your release cadence warrants it, ongoing regression monitoring is scoped separately after the sprint closes. There is no automatic retainer.

Process

How It Works

01

Free Consultation

We analyze your current situation — 24 hours, no cost.

02

Detailed Audit

Full report delivered in 5–10 business days with prioritized fixes.

03

Video Walkthrough

We explain every finding and answer your questions live.

04

Roadmap

Clear, prioritized action plan with timeline and expected results.

What does this look like in practice?

A typical engagement: an online store arrived with a six-month-old audit from another provider. The findings were sound, but nothing had shipped. We started with a scoping call, confirmed with a fresh crawl which findings still applied, and turned the top items into dev-ready tickets: a redirect cleanup, canonical rules for filter URLs, and a robots.txt correction that had been blocking a product section. The store's own developers shipped the changes over two release cycles. After each release we ran a QA crawl to confirm the fixes landed and nothing adjacent broke. The closing deliverable compared the Search Console state before and after: blocked sections crawlable again, duplicate variants consolidated, and coverage errors easing over the following weeks.

Anonymized example of our process, not a promise of results.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from your SEO Site Audit? +
The SEO Site Audit is diagnosis: we crawl and analyze your site, identify every significant technical issue, and hand you a prioritized report with specifications for each fix. This service is implementation: we take those findings, from our audit or any third-party audit, and actually ship the fixes, then validate they worked. Many clients do the audit first and then bring us in to execute. You can also start here if you already have a recent audit from another source, or if the problem is specific enough that scoping it is faster than a full diagnostic.
Do I need an audit before you start fixing? +
No. If you already have a recent audit, from us or anyone else, we can work directly from those findings. If you do not have an audit but have a specific, well-defined problem (a migration you need to run safely, a JS rendering issue you know exists, a crawl-budget problem on a large faceted site), we scope the sprint around that. The free scoping call is where we decide together whether a prior diagnostic is needed or whether the scope is already clear enough to start.
Can you work with our developers, produce Jira-ready tickets, and QA after they deploy? +
Yes, this is a normal working mode for us. We produce structured specifications (redirect maps, canonical logic, robots directive changes, meta-tag templates) formatted so a developer unfamiliar with the original audit can implement them without follow-up questions. After each batch of fixes ships, we run a post-deploy QA crawl to confirm the changes landed correctly and nothing adjacent regressed. We can also review pull requests or staging environments before they go live.
What exactly do we get when the sprint ends? +
Three things. First, the fixes themselves: either shipped by us under scoped access, or handed to your developers as dev-ready specs. Second, a post-fix QA crawl report that verifies each change landed correctly and nothing adjacent regressed. Third, a before and after Search Console snapshot, so the pre-fix baseline and the post-fix state are both documented in data. The sprint closes with verified changes, not another report about what should happen.
Will you actually make changes on our site, or just produce more documentation? +
We implement directly where you give us scoped access: Search Console, a staging environment, robots.txt via your hosting, or least-privilege CMS credentials for specific configuration pages. Where you prefer your own team to handle the code, we produce specifications precise enough to execute without us in the room. The deliverable is shipped fixes plus post-fix validation, not a document describing what someone else should do. Your accounts and CMS stay under your control throughout.
How do you handle a migration or replatforming? +
We break it into three stages: before, during, and after. Before cutover we build the full redirect inventory, crawl the staging environment to verify URL parity and canonical logic, and check that robots.txt on staging will not go live accidentally. On launch day we monitor crawl access and initial Search Console signals. In the four weeks after launch we track coverage, crawl rate, and ranking signals, and fix any gaps that appear before they accumulate into longer-term ranking loss. The goal is that Google's view of your site transitions cleanly rather than starting over.
Can you take over a migration another contractor started, or fix one that already failed? +
Yes, at any stage. Mid-migration, we rebuild the redirect inventory and diff the staging crawl against production before cutover. Post-launch, we triage Search Console coverage drops and close redirect gaps in priority order. One honest caveat: how fast rankings recover depends on Google's recrawl cycle, which nobody outside Google controls, so we never promise a recovery timeline.
What is crawl budget and does my site actually have a problem? +
Crawl budget is the finite number of URL requests Googlebot makes to your site in a given period. For most small sites it is not a meaningful constraint: Googlebot crawls everything anyway. It becomes a real issue on large sites, e-commerce stores with filtered navigation, or sites with parameter-generated URL sprawl, where Googlebot can spend most of its requests on low-value variants rather than the pages that should rank. We use server log files to show you where the crawl actually goes, which is often different from where you assume it goes.
Do you need server access for log-file analysis? +
No. We do not need admin or SSH access. An export of raw access logs from your hosting panel, or log files from your CDN (Cloudflare, Fastly and similar), is enough. You choose the date range and hand over the files. That keeps the engagement inside the least-privilege access model described on this page, and the DPA covers how the data is handled and deleted.
JavaScript-heavy site: can Google see my content and what do you fix? +
Googlebot can execute JavaScript, but it processes JS rendering in a second wave that may lag hours or days behind the initial crawl, and some content patterns still cause problems: body text that requires JavaScript to appear in the DOM, structured data injected client-side after page load, lazy-loading that fires after the crawl timeout, and hydration gaps where server-rendered and client-rendered content differ. We diagnose exactly which of these applies using a combination of raw-source inspection, render comparison, and log data, then implement the fix (SSR configuration, prerendering, or lazy-load timing adjustments) and verify the result in the raw HTML before and after.
Faceted navigation and filter URLs on a store: is this the right service? +
Partially. Crawl-budget engineering and indexation control for parameter URLs (deciding which filter combinations get crawled, which get noindexed, and how the canonical hierarchy works) is core work here. The organic ranking strategy for category and product pages, including Product schema authoring, category content depth, and site architecture for a catalogue, belongs to our E-commerce SEO service. Many stores need both: infrastructure remediation here first, then content and schema work there.
Is this a one-time project or ongoing? +
The sprint packages are fixed-scope, one-time engagements. After a sprint closes, ongoing monitoring and regression guard can be scoped as a separate engagement based on your site's size and release cadence. We do not publish a retainer price here because the right scope varies significantly. The free scoping call is where we work out whether ongoing monitoring makes sense for your situation and what that would cover.
Do you work alongside our existing SEO agency, or white-label for agencies? +
Yes to both. If an agency already handles your content and links, we slot in as an independent technical implementation arm and coordinate through their backlog or yours. Agencies also bring us in under their own brand for migrations and technical remediation. Either way there is no lock-in and no account takeover: access is scoped, revocable, and stays under your ownership.
What does it cost? +
The three sprint tiers are priced at €199, €399, and €750. The right tier depends on the scope of the remediation: a focused Quick-Fix Sprint for a defined set of issues, a Remediation Sprint for multi-issue work including JS rendering and crawl-budget engineering, or a Migration and Scale Sprint for replatforming projects or large-site indexation work. We confirm the exact tier after the free scoping call, usually within 24 hours of your first message.
How long does a sprint take? +
It depends on the tier and on your dev team's deploy cadence. A Quick-Fix Sprint with a clear scope moves faster than a migration that needs staging reviews and a launch window. We confirm the expected duration at the free scoping call, before you commit, so you get a timeline for your specific scope rather than a generic estimate.
Can you guarantee rankings or traffic recovery after the fixes? +
No, and we will be direct about why. Technical SEO removes barriers that prevent Google from crawling, rendering, and indexing your content correctly. Whether that translates into higher rankings and more traffic depends on content quality, competitive landscape, and Google's own evaluation, none of which we control. What we can confirm is that the technical blockers are removed and verified, and that we measure the before-and-after state so the impact is in data rather than a claim.
Do you cover Core Web Vitals and page speed? +
We fix rendering and delivery issues that affect how quickly content reaches both users and crawlers: SSR configuration, lazy-load timing, render-blocking resource handling, and TTFB. A deep Core Web Vitals diagnosis (identifying exactly which LCP candidate is slow, quantifying INP from real-user data, isolating CLS sources across page templates) belongs to the SEO Site Audit, which has the right scope and tooling for that level of performance work. If CWV is your primary concern, that is the better starting point.
What about structured data and schema markup? +
We ensure your existing schema is valid, present in the raw HTML source (not injected client-side), and uses the current schema.org vocabulary. We also add or correct schema types that are directly tied to crawlability and indexation: sitemap schema, breadcrumb markup, and canonicalization-related signals. Authoring new schema for content types (FAQPage, Article, Product) and optimizing structured data for AI Overview eligibility is covered under our AI SEO service, which specializes in that layer.
What about WordPress or a specific CMS? +
This service is CMS-agnostic: we work with any platform and implement fixes at the server-configuration and HTML-output level regardless of what generates the pages. CMS-specific concerns (Yoast and Rank Math configuration, WordPress taxonomy archive policies, plugin stack conflicts, WooCommerce product archive indexation) belong to our WordPress SEO service, which is built around the WordPress platform layer specifically. If you are unsure which applies, the scoping call will clarify.
Can AI crawlers fetch and parse my site? +
The same infrastructure that blocks Googlebot tends to block AI crawlers: JavaScript-only rendering, overly broad robots.txt Disallow rules, and slow TTFB that causes crawl timeouts before content is returned. We fix those at the infrastructure level, and we review robots.txt for unintended blocks on specific AI crawler agents (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended) where your strategy warrants it. Whether that translates into being cited in AI-generated answers is a content and entity question, not an infrastructure one. That work belongs to our AI SEO and AI Visibility services.
Where is data handled and how do you access our site safely? +
CyberLab.Team OÜ is registered in Tallinn, Estonia (EU), operating under GDPR. A Data Processing Agreement is available on request before any work begins. We access your site using the minimum permissions needed for each task: read access to Search Console and Analytics, a restricted staging environment login, or specific CMS configuration access with no billing or user-management permissions. We never ask for admin credentials we do not need, we never store access credentials beyond the engagement, and your accounts remain fully under your ownership throughout and after.

Not sure what is broken yet?

Start with the SEO Site Audit: deep technical diagnosis, Core Web Vitals analysis, and a prioritized roadmap. Then bring that roadmap here for implementation. WooCommerce or WordPress platform issues live in WordPress SEO; organic visibility for a store's category and product pages is E-commerce SEO.

See SEO Site Audit

Not Sure Where to Start?

Get a free preliminary audit — we'll show you the 3 biggest issues holding your business back online.

Request Free Audit

No commitment. Response within 24 hours.