Sample deliverable

SEO audit executive summary: the first page of the report

This is the opening part of an SEO site audit report: the scope that was crawled, the findings that matter most, and the order they should be fixed in. It is written for an owner who needs the decision, with the full evidence kept in the body of the report.

Example, not a client's data

The situation here is invented. Picture an online store with a catalog of about a thousand products, one language, a recent theme update and a marketing owner who is not a developer. Questions started after the category structure was rebuilt. There is no real client and no real site: every example below points at example.com.

What was reviewed

The audit covers the same blocks on every project, so one report can be compared with the next. This sample lists the blocks and leaves out the raw exports that sit behind them.

Crawl of the whole site with a desktop and a mobile user agent, plus a render check on the templates that carry the main content.
Indexing: which URLs Google knows about, which are excluded, and for which stated reason.
Core Web Vitals on the templates that matter, read from field data where it exists and from lab runs where it does not.
On page layer: titles, headings, whether the page answers the query it targets, internal links, and duplication between near identical pages.
Backlink profile: anchor distribution, the domains behind the links, and anything that looks bought rather than earned.
Competitors in the same result pages: what they cover that the site does not, and where the gap can realistically be closed.

Findings, ranked

Every row in the real report links to its evidence: the crawl export, the URL list and a screenshot. Priority is a judgment about impact against effort, and it is written down so it can be argued with.

Finding	Where	Why it matters	Priority	What to do
Filter combinations are crawlable and nearly identical to the clean category	Catalog filters	Crawl attention goes to variants instead of the page meant to rank	Critical	Canonical the variants to the clean category and noindex combinations with no demand behind them
Product description is written into the page only after JavaScript runs	Product template	The raw response carries no body copy, so the page can be indexed almost empty	Critical	Render the description server side and confirm it in the raw source
Two hosts answer for the same page	Site wide	Signals are split between two addresses and the wrong one can be chosen	Critical	Pick one host, redirect the other permanently, align canonical and sitemap
Titles start with the brand on every template	Site wide	The words that separate one product from another are pushed out of the visible snippet	High	Reorder the template so the specific part leads and the brand closes
The main image on category templates is uncompressed and loads late	Category template	The largest element on mobile arrives slowly, which affects both readers and crawl efficiency	High	Serve a modern format at the displayed size and preload only the one image that matters
Deep categories are linked from the footer only	Navigation	Pages far from the entry points collect little internal weight	High	Link them from the parent category body and from related products
The sitemap lists URLs that redirect	XML sitemap	The file stops being a trustworthy list of what should be indexed	Medium	Regenerate it from the live indexable set and keep the generation automatic
Product markup omits availability and condition	Product template	The listing is eligible for less in the result page than it could be	Medium	Fill the fields from the same source the page already shows
Anchors from one directory network repeat across many links	Backlink profile	The pattern reads as bought rather than earned	Medium	Review the list, keep what is genuinely useful and disavow the rest

The plan in three horizons

The order is not a wish list. Everything that blocks crawling, rendering or indexing comes first, because content and link work has no effect while a page cannot be read correctly.

Month 1: host consolidation, canonical rules on filters, server rendered product copy, sitemap regenerated. None of this needs new content.
Month 2: title and heading templates, internal links into the deep categories, image delivery on the templates with the worst field data.
Month 3: category copy that answers the question behind the query, product markup completed, the backlink review closed out.
Throughout: a crawl after each release, so a fix that shipped and was then reverted is noticed in days rather than next quarter.

How priority is decided

Critical means Google cannot read, reach or trust the page. It is fixed first regardless of how much traffic that page has today.
High means the page is read but presented poorly, or the demand it should serve goes to a weaker page on the same site.
Medium is hygiene: real, worth doing, and safe to schedule after the first two groups.
Effort is estimated with your team in mind. When impact is close, a change that needs one template edit outranks a change that needs a data migration.

What the audit itself does not cover

Writing the content. The report says which page needs an answer and what that answer has to address, not the finished text.
Shipping the fixes. Implementation is a separate service, and many owners hand the report to their own developer instead.
Paid search, social ads and email, unless the combined package is ordered.
Anything that rests on a promise about rankings. The report describes causes and fixes, not outcomes.

Synthetic example, not a client's data

Every finding here is invented to cover a common class of issue. A real report ranks what your site actually has, and the list is usually shorter in some blocks and longer in others.
The evidence is missing on purpose: a real report carries crawl exports, URL lists and screenshots behind each row.
No measured values appear anywhere in this sample, so nothing on this page should be read as a benchmark.
Scope is agreed before the work starts, so the block list on a real project follows the package you order.

A real summary sits in front of the full report: evidence for every row, a specification per fix, and a walkthrough call where the priorities are gone through together. The package that fits your site is described on the service page.

SEO Site Audit

Ready for the audit?

Send the site or the account and get a free preliminary check first: the biggest issues, the tier that fits and the fixed price. You decide after that.

Order the audit

No commitment. Response within one business day.